We help organizations design, secure, and operate compliant platforms without slowing down innovation. Our work focuses on reducing risk, strengthening governance, and embedding security into day-to-day operations—not selling tools or running fear-based audits.
Security and compliance are not isolated projects; they are foundational design and operating disciplines. We help organizations move beyond reactive controls and checklist-driven efforts by embedding security directly into platform architecture, engineering workflows, and operational processes.
Our approach balances risk exposure, regulatory obligations, and business agility. We support leadership teams in making deliberate decisions about control placement, access governance, and data protection—ensuring compliance objectives are achieved without introducing unnecessary friction or architectural complexity.
We prioritize clarity over abstraction, designing security models that are practical to implement, auditable by design, and aligned with how modern enterprises build, deploy, and operate technology systems.
Identify and prioritize risks across platforms, data, and operations.
Build security into platforms—not bolt it on later.
Control access across users, systems, and workloads.
We engage with organizations at different stages of their security and compliance journey—from early risk discovery to mature, regulated environments. Our role is to bring structure, clarity, and direction so teams can move from fragmented controls to cohesive, auditable security operations.
We work closely with technology, risk, and leadership teams to align security priorities with business objectives—ensuring that risk decisions are intentional, documented, and defensible.
Evaluating existing platforms, access models, data flows, and operational practices to identify risk exposure and define clear, prioritized security and compliance actions.
Designing secure cloud and platform architectures that align with business requirements, delivery models, and enterprise security principles.
Assessing identity, authentication, and authorization models to establish scalable access controls, role definitions, and governance frameworks.
Reviewing how sensitive data is stored, accessed, moved, and retained to define appropriate classification, encryption, and protection mechanisms.
Mapping regulatory and policy requirements to technical and operational controls, ensuring compliance expectations are practical, auditable, and sustainable.
Defining security operating models, monitoring approaches, and response processes to support ongoing risk management and continuous improvement.
It is about establishing risk and control frameworks that remain defensible, measurable, and sustainable as threats and regulatory expectations change.
Security must be designed into platforms, networks, identity systems, and data flows from the start. We prioritize structural safeguards over reactive fixes.
Not every vulnerability is material. We focus on meaningful exposure, realistic threat paths, and decisions that materially reduce risk.
Security cannot rely on policy alone. Controls must be technically enforceable, measurable, and embedded within delivery and operational workflows.
Security and compliance must function under real-world constraints. We design models that teams can maintain, scale, and defend during audits or incidents.
Whether you’re addressing emerging risks, preparing for audits, or strengthening security governance, we help you assess where you stand and define the controls that matter. Engage with us to bring structure, confidence, and defensibility to your security and compliance decisions.
This engagement focuses on engineering and validating security controls across cloud platforms, applications, identity systems, data layers, and operational processes. The objective is to identify real risk, verify control effectiveness, and provide clear remediation direction—not to run isolated scans or one-off tests.
Activities are selected based on architecture, threat exposure, and compliance needs, ensuring assessments are technically meaningful and aligned with enterprise environments.
Establish a clear view of security posture and exposure across environments.
Key activities include:
Analyze cloud, network, and application architectures to identify risk concentration points
Review trust boundaries, attack surfaces, and data flow paths
Evaluate security control coverage and enforcement gaps
Prioritize risks based on exploitability, blast radius, and business impact
Assess cloud environments for misconfigurations and control weaknesses.
Key activities include:
Review account / subscription structure and isolation models
Validate IAM policies, role assignments, and privilege boundaries
Analyze network segmentation, routing, and ingress/egress controls
Identify configuration gaps impacting confidentiality, integrity, or availability
Validate access models and privilege governance across users and systems.
Key activities include:
Review user, service, and workload identities
Identify excessive permissions and toxic role combinations
Evaluate authentication and authorization flows
Validate access lifecycle controls and governance processes
Evaluate application-level risks and design weaknesses.
Key activities include:
Perform threat modeling for applications and APIs
Review authentication, authorization, and session handling
Analyze input validation, error handling, and abuse cases
Identify insecure integrations and dependency risks
Validate exploitable weaknesses and control effectiveness.
Key activities include:
Conduct vulnerability assessments across infrastructure and applications
Perform targeted penetration testing to validate attack paths
Test privilege escalation and lateral movement scenarios
Map findings to remediation actions and control improvements
Assess security visibility and detection capabilities.
Key activities include:
Review logging coverage across infrastructure, applications, and identity systems
Validate alerting logic and signal quality
Identify detection blind spots and response gaps
Align monitoring capabilities with threat scenarios
Evaluate preparedness to respond to security incidents.
Key activities include:
Review incident response plans and escalation workflows
Validate containment, recovery, and communication processes
Conduct tabletop exercises and scenario walkthroughs
Identify operational gaps and improvement opportunities
Support audit and regulatory requirements with defensible controls.
Key activities include:
Validate implementation and effectiveness of security controls
Map controls to regulatory and internal requirements
Identify evidence gaps and documentation weaknesses
Prepare teams for audits, reviews, and regulatory assessments
Security initiatives must translate into enforceable controls and measurable risk reduction—not documentation alone. Our delivery framework ensures every engagement produces technically sound, operationally sustainable, and audit-defensible outcomes.
Implementation-ready outputs that ensure security, risk, and compliance initiatives are enforceable, auditable, and operable — not just documented.
A structured, technically grounded engagement focused on clarity, collaboration, and defensible security outcomes.
Testimonials
Pricing
Single Project
Single Prost
Portfolio
